United States Real Estate Investor

United States Real Estate Investor

United States Real Estate Investor logo is a registered trademark of Universe Media Publishing, LLC
Close this search box.
United States Real Estate Investor

United States Real Estate Investor

Close this search box.
United States Real Estate Investor

United States Real Estate Investor

Close this search box.
Banner Privy - Direct To MLS Data banner ad

NAR Found Guilty in $1.8B Loss (Massive Commissions Dead)

NAR Found Guilty in $1.5B Loss (Massive Commissions Dead)
Missouri court ruling against NAR could revolutionize the real estate industry, potentially ending massive agent commissions and reshaping buyer and seller interactions in the U.S. housing market.
The Ultimate Guide to ChatGPT Equations for Real Estate Investing FREE SAMPLE!
Diversified Mortgage Expo (DME) 2024 Note Investing Conference
Table of Contents

Key Takeaways

  • Legal Precedent: The Missouri court ruling against NAR and major brokerages for inflating commissions may set a precedent for future real estate transactions and commission structures.
  • Scrutiny of NAR’s Role: NAR’s policies, particularly those mandating seller-paid buyer agent commissions, are under intense scrutiny, potentially leading to industry-wide changes.
  • Long-Term Industry Impact: The outcome of this case and subsequent appeals could significantly impact how real estate commissions are negotiated and paid, potentially leading to more competitive and consumer-friendly practices.
NAR Found Guilty in $1.5B Loss (Massive Commissions Dead) - judges chamber, scales of justice, verdict and ruling

Impact of Recent Court Rulings on Future of Real Estate Commissions

Recent developments in the real estate industry, particularly a critical court ruling in Missouri, signal potential changes to the longstanding tradition of real estate agent commissions.

This case could have far-reaching implications for the way commissions are structured and impact the roles of both sellers and agents in real estate transactions.

The Missouri Court Ruling and Its Consequences

  1. Missouri Federal Court’s Verdict: In a landmark decision, a federal jury in Missouri found the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and several major real estate brokerages guilty of artificially inflating commission rates. The jury ordered them to pay almost $1.8 billion in damages. This verdict could lead to a major upheaval in long-established practices within the real estate industry, particularly around commission rates​​​.

  2. NAR’s Role in Commission Structuring: The NAR has played a significant role in shaping the real estate commission structure. A major focus of the lawsuits was an NAR rule that required home sellers to not only pay a commission to their listing agent but also cover the commission for the buyer’s agent. This practice, plaintiffs argued, kept buyer’s agent commissions artificially high and stifled competition​​​.

  3. Potential Triple Damages: The court has the option to award treble damages, potentially increasing the financial penalty to more than $5 billion. This possibility underscores the severity of the ruling and its potential impact on the real estate industry​.

Historical Facts About the Evolution of Real Estate Agent Commissions

  1. Establishment of Commission Structure (1913): The year 1913 was significant for the real estate industry as it marked the creation of a standardized commission structure by the National Association of Real Estate Exchanges, the predecessor to the National Association of Realtors (NAR). This structure defined that a customer selling a home would pay a percentage of the sales price to the seller’s agent, who would then share the commission with the buyer’s agent.

  2. Commission Rates in the Early 20th Century: In the 1920s, real estate commission rates were around 2.5% of a home’s sale price. For example, in 1920, if a home sold for the average price of $6,296, the agent would earn a commission of $157.40, which was then split with the buyer’s agent, each receiving $78.70. By 1940, with the growth of communities and the need for more real estate agents, the standard commission rate increased to 5%. This rate continued to rise, reaching 6% by the 1980s, a figure that remains the industry standard today.

  3. Reasons Behind Commission Levels: The establishment of standardized commission levels was largely due to the challenges faced by agents in the early 20th century. There was no centralized database of homes for sale, requiring agents to maintain their own records and perform extensive research. The absence of the Internet and other modern technologies meant that agents had to spend considerable time and resources on travel and communication. However, with the advent of the Internet and the development of the Multiple Listing Service (MLS), which offered a comprehensive list of homes for sale, the ease of accessing and sharing real estate information significantly improved. This technological evolution has led to changes in how agents operate and has impacted the value of the services they provide.

  4. Change in Commission Rates Over Time: In recent years, there has been a notable decline in commission rates in the U.S., falling from about 6% to just over 5%. A study by RealTrends, cited by the NAR, reported that the average commission in the U.S. fell to 4.94% in 2020, reflecting unprecedented competition among brokers and a changing landscape in the real estate industry.

  5. Impact of Legal and Regulatory Changes: The role of the NAR and its policies, including those related to commission structures, has been a topic of legal scrutiny and regulatory changes. For instance, a 2008 settlement with the U.S. Justice Department required the NAR to stop withholding listings from members who might post them online, allowing customers greater control over their search process and access to real estate market information.


Housing Wire

Immediate and Long-Term Implications

  1. No Immediate Changes for Homebuyers and Sellers: Despite the significant ruling, immediate changes in how agent commissions are handled, especially for homes listed on the Multiple Listing Service (MLS), are unlikely. NAR has vowed to appeal the verdict, indicating that any changes to commission practices may take time to materialize​.

  2. Watching for Further Court Decisions: The industry is closely monitoring what further actions the court may take, especially regarding how it might order the industry to restructure agent compensation. A critical consideration is whether buyers could potentially finance buyer-agent commissions as part of their mortgages, although current regulatory barriers strongly supported by the industry may hinder this​.

  3. Impact on Home Prices: Stephen Brobeck, a senior fellow at the Consumer Federation of America, noted that buyer agent’s commissions are typically added to the sale price of the house, inflating it. If sellers no longer had to pay buyer agents, this inflation could be reduced, allowing buyers to negotiate lower commissions and ultimately pay less​.


The recent Missouri federal court ruling marks a pivotal moment in the real estate industry, challenging long-standing commission practices.

This decision against the National Association of Realtors and major brokerages not only highlights issues of antitrust violations but also opens the door for significant changes in how real estate transactions are structured financially.

While immediate impacts on homebuyers and sellers may not be evident, the industry is poised for potential shifts toward more transparent and competitive commission practices.

As appeals and further legal actions unfold, the real estate landscape remains under watchful eyes, with both professionals and consumers anticipating future developments.

This case serves as a catalyst for re-examining and possibly reforming a century-old system, potentially leading to a more equitable and efficient real estate market.

Thank you for visiting United States Real Estate Investor.

Information Disclaimer

The information, opinions, and insights presented on United States Real Estate Investor are intended to educate and inform our readers about the dynamic world of real estate investing in the United States.

While we strive to provide accurate, up-to-date, and reliable information, we encourage readers to consult with professional real estate advisors, financial experts, or legal counsel before making any investment decisions.

Our team of expert writers, researchers, and contributors work diligently to gather information from credible sources. However, the real estate market is subject to fluctuations, changes, and unforeseen events.

United States Real Estate Investor cannot guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the information presented, nor can we be held responsible for any actions taken based on the content found on our website.

We may include links to third-party websites, products, or services.

These links are provided for convenience and do not constitute an endorsement or approval by United States Real Estate Investor.

We are not responsible for the content, privacy policies, or practices of any third-party sites.

Opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of United States Real Estate Investor.

We welcome diverse perspectives and encourage healthy debate and discussion.

By accessing and using the content on United States Real Estate Investor, you agree to this disclaimer and acknowledge that the information provided is for informational and educational purposes only.

If you have any questions, concerns, or feedback, please feel free to visit our contact page.

United States Real Estate Investor.


Don't miss out on the value

Join our thousands of subscribers

Subscribe to our newsletter to learn how to attract clients, close deals faster, and a lot more!

United States Real Estate Investor logo
Rentcast for Real Estate Investing
Explode your real estate business with David Randolph's proven workshops

This is the easiest way to know the industry.
The Ultimate Real Estate Investing Glossary

More content


Web & Social yearly Package

Please, have ad set files ready before purchase.

Please, be aware that after your purchase on the Stripe payment portal, keep your browser open; You will be automatically redirected to the ad set submission page.


Web & Social Monthly Package

Please, have ad set files ready before purchase.

Please, be aware that after your purchase on the Stripe payment portal, keep your browser open; You will be automatically redirected to the ad set submission page.