Key Takeaways
Increased Return-to-Office Mandates: There’s a significant rise in companies requiring employees to work from the office, with 88% enforcing such mandates, up from 69% last year.
Office Space Reduction Plans: A notable 75% of companies plan to cut down office square footage next year, a considerable increase from 46% in 2022.
Concerns Over Office Retention: Amidst these changes, 82% of companies express worries about maintaining their current office spaces, influenced by potential recession risks and space underutilization.
The latest survey by workplace strategy firm Robin reveals a perplexing trend in the corporate world: a surge in return-to-office mandates amidst ongoing office downsizing.
Analysis for Commercial Real Estate Investors
Office Space Demand Shifts
Reduced Space Requirements: The move towards smaller office spaces reflects a shift in corporate space needs. This trend may reduce the demand for large office buildings and increase interest in smaller, more flexible office spaces.
Investment Opportunities in Flexible Spaces: As companies favor “flexible office spaces deeply focused on collaboration“, investors should consider properties that offer modularity and collaborative environments.
| Year | Companies Mandating Office Work | Companies Planning to Reduce Office Space |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 69% | 46% |
| 2023 | 88% | 75% |
This table highlights a significant increase in companies mandating office work, from 69% last year to 88% this year. Simultaneously, there is a notable rise in companies planning to reduce office space, from 46% in the previous year to 75% currently.
Return-to-office Psychology
The psychology and thought processes behind return-to-office mandates are multifaceted, reflecting a blend of organizational, economic, and cultural factors.
Here are some key considerations:
Productivity and Collaboration: Many employers believe that in-person interactions foster better collaboration, creativity, and productivity. They argue that certain tasks and projects benefit from face-to-face communication.
Corporate Culture and Identity: Maintaining a strong corporate culture is another driving force. Employers often view physical office spaces as crucial for sustaining the company’s identity, values, and community spirit.
Management and Oversight: Some companies prefer having employees on-site for easier management and oversight. This can stem from a traditional view of work or concerns about maintaining efficiency and accountability.
Employee Well-being and Engagement: There’s a recognition that office environments can enhance employee well-being and engagement through social interactions and a structured routine, which can be lacking in remote settings.
Economic Considerations: Economic factors also play a role, especially for businesses with significant investments in office real estate. Utilizing these spaces effectively can be seen as an economic imperative.
—
Sources:
Real Estate Market Dynamics
Location Preferences: The downsizing trend might shift interest from central business districts to suburban areas, where smaller, more affordable office spaces are available.
- Long-term Leasing Implications: Investors in commercial real estate should be cautious about long-term leases, considering the current volatility and changing corporate preferences.
Fun Fact
Despite the shift towards hybrid work models, the global market size for flexible workspace is projected to reach $111.68 billion by 2025, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15.1% from 2020.
This growth reflects the increasing demand for adaptable and collaborative work environments that align with the trends highlighted in the Robin survey.
—
Source: Grand View Research
Tenant Stability Concerns
Economic Uncertainty: The worry among companies about retaining their office spaces, partly due to economic uncertainty, suggests a potential increase in short-term leases and a focus on lease flexibility.
Risk Assessment: Investors must closely evaluate tenant stability and diversify their portfolios to mitigate risks associated with tenant turnover or inability to sustain leases.
| Office Utilization | Percentage This Year | Change from Last Year (Percentage Points) |
|---|---|---|
| Full-Time | 56% | +19 |
| Hybrid | 40% | -21 |
| Fully Remote | 4% | N/A |
This table shows an increase in companies having their employees work in the office full-time (up 19 percentage points from last year), a decrease in hybrid work arrangements (down 21 percentage points), and a small percentage (4%) of companies being fully remote.
Question: Are return-to-office mandates working?
Answer: Return-to-office mandates are experiencing mixed results.
While some companies successfully bring employees back to the office, others face resistance.
A significant factor influencing their effectiveness is the nature of the work and employee preferences.
For instance, a study by Microsoft found that 73% of workers want flexible remote work options to continue, suggesting a potential clash with strict return-to-office policies.
Office occupancy levels in major cities, although slowly increasing, are still well below pre-pandemic levels, indicating a slow uptake of these mandates.
—
Sources:
Microsoft Work Trend Index
Kastle Systems’ Office Occupancy Data
Assesment
The paradox of increasing return-to-office mandates alongside office downsizing presents both challenges and opportunities for real estate investors.
A strategic shift towards investing in flexible, collaborative spaces, especially in suburban locations, might be beneficial.
However, heightened vigilance is required to navigate the uncertainties of tenant stability and economic fluctuations.
